What Is Greenwashing in Fashion? How to Spot It While Shopping

By fashiongoggled Editorial Team — Senior editors with 10+ years of subject-matter experience.
Published 2026-05-26 · Last Updated 2026-05-26

Affiliate disclosure: This article may contain affiliate links. Recommendations are independent and editorially driven.

In an era where conscious consumerism is rapidly gaining momentum, the fashion industry finds itself at a pivotal crossroads. Consumers, more than ever, are demanding transparency, ethical production, and environmental responsibility from the brands they choose to support. This desire for more sustainable style choices is commendable and necessary, pushing the industry towards much-needed reforms. However, this shift has also unfortunately paved the way for a pervasive and insidious practice known as greenwashing.

Greenwashing in fashion is not merely a buzzword; it’s a deceptive marketing tactic employed by companies to portray an environmentally friendly, ethical, or sustainable image without genuinely implementing substantial, impactful practices. It’s a smokescreen designed to capitalize on growing consumer awareness and desire for sustainability, often without doing the actual work required to earn that reputation. For the discerning shopper, understanding what greenwashing is and, more importantly, how to spot it, is crucial for making truly responsible purchasing decisions.

This comprehensive guide from fashiongoggled will delve deep into the nuances of greenwashing in the fashion industry. We’ll explore its origins, the various forms it takes, the psychological tactics brands employ, and provide you with actionable strategies to become a more informed and empowered consumer. Our goal is to equip you with the knowledge to cut through the marketing noise, identify genuinely sustainable brands, and contribute to a more ethical and environmentally sound future for fashion.

The Genesis of Greenwashing: A Brief History and Its Evolution

While the term “greenwashing” might feel relatively modern, the concept of misrepresenting environmental efforts has roots stretching back decades. The term itself is often attributed to environmentalist Jay Westerveld, who, in a 1986 essay, critiqued the hotel industry’s practice of placing “reuse your towels” notices in rooms, ostensibly for environmental reasons, but primarily to cut laundry costs. This early example highlighted how superficial “green” initiatives could mask a lack of deeper commitment.

Early Environmental Concerns and Corporate Responses

The 1960s and 1970s saw a rise in public environmental awareness, fueled by events like the first Earth Day in 1970 and influential publications such as Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring.” As regulatory bodies began to form and environmental legislation gained traction, corporations found themselves under increasing scrutiny. Initial responses often involved adopting minimal changes or, more cynically, engaging in public relations campaigns to deflect criticism without undertaking significant operational overhauls. This early form of greenwashing largely focused on downplaying negative impacts or highlighting minor positive actions.

The Rise of Consumer Awareness and “Eco-Friendly” Labels

By the turn of the millennium and certainly in the 2010s, consumer demand for “eco-friendly” and “sustainable” products truly began to surge. This was driven by a confluence of factors: increased scientific consensus on climate change, wider media coverage of environmental disasters, and the rise of digital platforms that allowed for rapid dissemination of information (and misinformation). The fashion industry, historically one of the most polluting sectors globally, found itself particularly vulnerable to these new pressures.

Brands quickly recognized the market potential in appealing to environmentally conscious consumers. Terms like “natural,” “organic,” “recycled,” and “sustainable” began to proliferate on labels and marketing materials. However, without clear, universally accepted definitions or robust third-party verification, these terms became fertile ground for ambiguity and exploitation. The rapid growth of “fast fashion” during this period, ironically, ran counter to true sustainability, yet many of these same brands would begin to incorporate “eco-collections” or “conscious” lines, often with little genuine impact.

The Digital Age and Amplified Greenwashing

The advent of social media and influencer marketing has further complicated the greenwashing landscape. Brands can now disseminate their “green” messages directly to vast audiences, often leveraging appealing visuals and emotional narratives without strong factual backing. The ease of creating online campaigns that emphasize a brand’s purported sustainability, coupled with the difficulty for consumers to verify these claims independently, has made greenwashing more sophisticated and pervasive than ever before. In 2026, with sophisticated data analytics and targeted advertising, brands can tailor their greenwashing messages with precision, making it even harder for consumers to discern truth from fiction.

Defining Greenwashing in Fashion Context

At its core, greenwashing in fashion is the act of misleading consumers regarding the environmental practices of a company or the environmental benefits of a product or service. It’s about perception management rather than genuine environmental stewardship. For fashion, this often touches upon a wide array of problematic areas, from material sourcing and manufacturing processes to labor practices and end-of-life considerations for garments.

[INLINE IMAGE 1: place after second H2 | alt=”What Is Greenwashing in Fashion? How to Spot It While Shopping concept illustration”]

Key Characteristics of Greenwashing

• Vagueness: Using broad, undefined terms like “eco-friendly,” “natural,” “sustainable,” or “green” without providing specific details or certifications to back them up. What does “eco-friendly” truly mean in the context of a polyester garment?
• Irrelevance: Highlighting a marginally positive attribute while ignoring more significant negative impacts. A brand might proudly state their packaging is 100% recycled, yet their core production process is highly polluting and exploitative.
• Lesser of Two Evils: Claiming to be “green” within an inherently unsustainable product category. For example, a “sustainable” synthetic fabric that still contributes to microplastic pollution may be presented as a responsible choice without acknowledging its fundamental drawbacks.
• Hidden Trade-offs: Emphasizing one “green” attribute while neglecting or obscuring other, more damaging environmental impacts. A garment made from organic cotton might still have a massive water footprint or be dyed with toxic chemicals.
• No Proof: Making environmental claims without providing accessible evidence or third-party certifications to substantiate them. “Our factory uses less water” is a claim that requires data, not just assertion.
• Fibbing/Outright Lying: Making false claims or fabricating certifications. While rare due to potential legal repercussions, some brands may still engage in this, especially in less regulated markets.
• Worshipping False Labels: Using fake independent labels or seals of approval to give an impression of third-party endorsement that doesn’t exist or is not credible.

Why Brands Engage in Greenwashing

The primary motivation for greenwashing is, like most corporate strategies, profit. Brands observe the rising consumer demand for sustainability and seek to capture market share without incurring the often significant costs associated with genuinely transforming their supply chains and operational practices. The perceived benefits include:

• Enhanced Brand Image: Positioning the brand as responsible, ethical, and forward-thinking.
• Increased Sales: Attracting conscious consumers willing to pay a premium for perceived sustainable products.
• Competitive Advantage: Differentiating the brand from competitors who may not be making “green” claims.
• Risk Mitigation: Preempting potential criticism or regulatory action by appearing proactive on environmental issues.
• Investor Appeal: Attracting impact investors who prioritize ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) factors.

Understanding these motivations helps consumers realize that greenwashing is often a calculated business strategy, not just an accidental miscommunication. This knowledge is your first line of defense in identifying deceptive claims.

Common Greenwashing Tactics in Fashion Marketing

Greenwashing manifests in various forms within the fashion industry, often cleverly disguised within marketing campaigns, product descriptions, and corporate communications. Recognizing these common tactics is a critical step towards becoming an informed consumer.

Vague and Unsubstantiated Claims

• “Eco-Friendly” / “Sustainable”: These terms are perhaps the most overused and under-defined. Without context, they mean very little. What specific environmental impact is being reduced? How is it measured? A truly sustainable claim will be specific, e.g., “Made with 50% recycled polyester certified by GRS.”
• “Natural” / “Organic”: While these terms can be positive, they’re not always a guarantee of overall sustainability. “Natural” dyes can still be toxic, and “organic” cotton, while better for soil and farmers, still requires significant water. Always look for specific certifications (e.g., GOTS for organic textiles).
• “Conscious Collection”: Many fast fashion brands introduce limited “conscious” or “eco” collections. These often represent a tiny fraction of their overall production, while their core business remains highly unsustainable. It’s a distraction from broader systemic issues.

Misleading Language and Imagery

• Green Hues and Nature Imagery: Brands often use colors like green and earthy tones, alongside images of lush landscapes, pristine rivers, or smiling artisans, regardless of whether their production practices actually reflect such idyllic scenes. This creates a subconscious association with nature and purity.
• “Feel-Good” Narratives: Marketing often focuses on emotional appeals – “Join us in saving the planet!” or “Wear your values!” – without providing concrete details about how their products contribute to these lofty goals.
• Focus on a Single, Minor “Green” Element: A brand might heavily promote that their hang tags are recycled, while their garments are made from virgin synthetics, dyed with harsh chemicals, and produced in exploitative factories. This highlights an irrelevant positive while ignoring significant harms.

Lack of Transparency and Verification

• Absence of Supply Chain Information: A genuinely sustainable brand will typically be transparent about its supply chain, from fiber sourcing to manufacturing facilities. Greenwashers often provide vague statements like “ethically made” or “sourced responsibly” without disclosing the names or locations of their factories, details about labor conditions, or environmental certifications specific to those facilities.
• Self-Declared Claims Without Third-Party Certification: Many brands make claims like “our own standard for sustainability” or “our internal audit confirms…” These are often meaningless without independent verification. Look for reputable third-party certifications like GOTS, Fair Trade, OEKO-TEX, Bluesign, or the Global Recycled Standard (GRS).
• Inaccessible Information: Claims might be buried deep within a corporate social responsibility report that is difficult to find, overly technical, or lacks clear, actionable data. True transparency means easy access to key information.

Distraction and “Whataboutism”

• Blaming the Consumer: Some brands might push the responsibility entirely onto the consumer, e.g., “Extend the life of your garments by washing less.” While consumer behavior is important, it deflects from the brand’s own responsibility in producing durable, high-quality, and genuinely circular products.
• Focusing on End-of-Life Without Addressing Production: Emphasizing recycling programs or donation initiatives without addressing the massive environmental impact of their initial production processes. While these programs are helpful, they don’t absolve a brand of its primary environmental footprint.

By understanding these common tactics, consumers can begin to critically analyze the messages presented to them and look beyond the surface-level “green” facade.

The Impact of Greenwashing on Consumers and the Planet

Greenwashing isn’t just a harmless marketing gimmick; it carries significant negative consequences for both individual consumers and the broader movement towards genuine sustainability in fashion.

Consumer Deception and Erosion of Trust

• Misinformation and Confusion: Greenwashing saturates the market with vague and often contradictory claims, making it incredibly difficult for consumers to differentiate between genuinely sustainable options and misleading ones. This leads to decision fatigue and cynicism.
• Wasted Efforts: When consumers unknowingly purchase greenwashed products, their intention to support ethical and environmental practices is undermined. They spend their money on items that don’t align with their values, and their purchasing power doesn’t effectively contribute to positive change.
• Erosion of Trust: Repeated exposure to deceptive “green” claims leads to a lack of trust in all sustainability messaging, even from genuinely responsible brands. This makes it harder for true leaders in sustainable fashion to gain traction and communicate their authentic efforts.
• “Green Blame”: Some consumers, after realizing they’ve been misled, become disillusioned and may even abandon their efforts to shop sustainably, feeling that it’s too difficult or impossible to make a real difference.

Hindering Genuine Sustainable Progress

• Undermining Responsible Brands: Companies that invest heavily in ethical supply chains, sustainable materials, and fair labor practices often face higher production costs. Greenwashers, by cutting corners, can offer seemingly “sustainable” products at lower prices, unfairly competing with and penalizing truly responsible brands.
• Dilution of Standards: When vague or unverified terms become industry norms, the power and meaning of genuine certifications and rigorous standards are diluted. This makes it harder to establish and enforce clear benchmarks for sustainability.
• Delaying Systemic Change: Greenwashing allows brands to appear responsible without making fundamental changes to their unsustainable business models (e.g., fast fashion’s emphasis on rapid consumption). This delays the necessary systemic transformations required for a truly circular and ethical fashion industry.
• Environmental Damage Continues: The most critical impact is that while brands portray themselves as green, their actual operations continue to contribute to pollution, resource depletion, waste generation, and poor labor conditions. The planet pays the price, and exploited workers suffer, all under the guise of sustainability.

Understanding these repercussions underscores why it’s so important for consumers to develop critical thinking skills when evaluating fashion brands and their sustainability claims. Your choices have power, and knowing how to wield that power effectively is paramount.

How to Spot Greenwashing: A Practical Guide for Shoppers

Becoming an expert at spotting greenwashing requires a discerning eye and a willingness to dig a little deeper than what’s presented on the surface. Here’s a practical guide to help you navigate the complex world of fashion marketing and make truly informed sustainable choices.

[INLINE IMAGE 2: place after fourth H2 | alt=”What Is Greenwashing in Fashion? How to Spot It While Shopping comparison illustration”]

Look for Concrete Evidence, Not Just Buzzwords

• Specificity is Key: Vague terms like “eco-friendly,” “sustainable,” “green,” or “responsible” are red flags if not accompanied by specific details. A legitimate claim will explain how a product is sustainable (e.g., “made with 100% GOTS-certified organic cotton,” “uses 50% less water in denim production,” “produced in a Fair Trade certified factory”).
• Certifications, Certifications, Certifications: Look for recognized third-party certifications. These labels indicate that an independent organization has verified a brand’s claims against a set of rigorous standards.
• Beyond the Product Label: Don’t just read the tag. Visit the brand’s website. A genuinely sustainable brand will have a dedicated section (often titled “Sustainability,” “Our Impact,” or “Ethics”) that provides detailed information, reports, and evidence. If this information is hard to find or conspicuously absent, be wary.

Scrutinize Reputable Third-Party Certifications

Not all certifications are created equal. Familiarize yourself with some of the most respected ones:

Certification	Focus	What It Means for You
GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard)	Organic fibers, ecological & social criteria throughout the supply chain.	Guarantees organic status from harvesting through environmentally and socially responsible manufacturing.
Fair Trade Certified™	Fair wages, safe working conditions, community empowerment.	Ensures workers received fair payment & helps fund community development projects.
OEKO-TEX Standard 100	Absence of harmful substances.	Assures textiles are tested for harmful substances and are safe for human ecological terms.
Bluesign®	Resource productivity, consumer safety, water/air emissions, occupational health.	A holistic approach ensuring sustainable production processes from start to finish.
GRS (Global Recycled Standard)	Recycled content, social & environmental practices, chemical restrictions.	Verifies recycled content in products and responsible production.
B Corp Certification	Overall social and environmental performance, transparency, accountability.	Indicates a company meets high standards of verified performance, accountability, and transparency on factors from employee benefits and charitable giving to supply chain practices and input materials.
Leather Working Group (LWG)	Environmental performance of leather manufacturers.	Assesses tanneries based on their environmental compliance and capabilities.

Question the “Conscious Collection” Phenomena

If a large fast-fashion brand suddenly launches a small “conscious” line, consider the context. Does this collection truly represent a shift in their overall business model, or is it a small, token effort designed to appeal to sustainability trends while the vast majority of their production remains highly unsustainable? Look at the bigger picture of the brand’s offerings. Is the “sustainable” collection priced significantly higher? Is it primarily made from conventional materials with a tiny percentage of recycled content?

Investigate Supply Chain Transparency

• Disclosed Suppliers: Reputable sustainable brands often list their factories, suppliers, and sometimes even the names of the craftspeople involved. This builds trust and accountability.
• Audits and Worker Welfare: Do they mention independent audits of their factories? Do they discuss concrete initiatives for worker safety, fair wages, and empowerment? Claims of “ethical production” without any supporting details are thin.
• Material Origin: A brand claiming to use recycled materials should be able to state the source of those materials (e.g., post-consumer plastic bottles collected in X region).

Beware of Greenwashing by Omission

This is when a brand highlights one positive aspect while carefully omitting crucial negative information. For example, a brand might use “organic cotton” but fail to mention the toxic dyes used or the exploitative labor practices in their garment factories. A holistic view of sustainability encompasses environmental, social, and ethical dimensions. A truly sustainable brand addresses all these areas.

Consider Longevity and Circularity

True sustainability isn’t just about how an item is made but also how long it lasts and what happens to it at the end of its life. Does the brand promote durability, repair services, or take-back programs for recycling or upcycling? Fast fashion, by its very nature of encouraging frequent purchases of trend-driven, disposable items, is inherently unsustainable, regardless of any “eco” claims.

Utilize External Resources

Several organizations and apps are dedicated to helping consumers navigate sustainable fashion:

• Good On You: This app and website rates thousands of fashion brands on their impact on people, the planet, and animals. It’s an excellent tool for quick checks on brand sustainability claims.
• Fashion Revolution: An organization that campaigns for greater transparency in the fashion supply chain. Their annual Fashion Transparency Index is a valuable resource.
• Ethical Consumer: Provides detailed ethical ratings for products and companies.

By integrating these practices into your shopping habits, you can become a powerful force in pushing the fashion industry towards genuine sustainability and holding brands accountable for their claims.

Beyond Spotting: Supporting Genuine Sustainable Fashion

Identifying greenwashing is a vital first step, but the journey towards a more sustainable wardrobe doesn’t end there. Actively supporting brands that are genuinely committed to ethical and environmentally responsible practices is crucial for driving real change in the fashion industry.

Prioritize Durability and Quality

One of the most impactful sustainable choices you can make is to buy fewer, better-quality items that are designed to last. Fast fashion’s business model relies on planned obsolescence and encourages constant consumption. By investing in durable, timeless pieces, you reduce your overall consumption and waste. Consider the material quality, construction, and care instructions to gauge a garment’s potential lifespan.

For more on building a high-quality, lasting wardrobe, explore our guide to capsule wardrobe essentials.

Embrace Secondhand and Vintage

The most sustainable garment is often the one that already exists. Shopping secondhand, whether at thrift stores, consignment shops, or online marketplaces, drastically reduces the demand for new production and keeps clothes out of landfills. Vintage pieces are not only sustainable but also offer unique style and a rich history. This approach directly counters the linear “take-make-dispose” model of conventional fashion.

Choose Materials Wisely (and Critically)

Understanding the impact of different materials is key:

• Preferred Fibers: Look for materials like GOTS-certified organic cotton, linen (flax), hemp, Tencel™ Lyocell, EcoVero™ Viscose, recycled cotton, recycled polyester (GRS-certified), and innovative bio-based materials like Piñatex (pineapple leather) or Mycelium (mushroom leather).
• Understand the Nuances: Even “natural” fibers have varied impacts. Organic cotton is better than conventional cotton, but linen and hemp generally require less water and pesticides. Recycled synthetics are better than virgin synthetics but still contribute to microplastic shedding. Always consider the full lifecycle.
• Avoid Problematic Materials: Try to minimize purchases of virgin petroleum-based synthetics (polyester, nylon, acrylic), conventional cotton, and conventional rayon/viscose unless certified from sustainably managed forests (e.g., FSC-certified).

Support Transparent Brands

Actively seek out brands that are open about their entire supply chain, from fiber growth to garment assembly. A genuinely sustainable brand will provide:

• Factory Locations and Names: Not just a generic “ethically produced.”
• Social Audits and Labor Practices: Details on fair wages, safe working conditions, and worker empowerment initiatives.
• Environmental Performance Data: Information on water usage, energy consumption, waste reduction, and chemical management.
• Certifications: Clearly displayed and easily verifiable third-party certifications.

This transparency allows you to make informed decisions and holds brands accountable for their promises.

Value Repair and Care

Extend the life of your clothes by learning basic mending skills or utilizing professional repair services. Following care instructions diligently (washing in cold water, air-drying, avoiding excessive washing) also significantly reduces the environmental impact of your wardrobe and ensures your garments last longer. A garment cared for is a sustainable garment.

Participate in the Circular Economy

Beyond buying secondhand, look for brands that offer take-back programs, rental services, or robust recycling initiatives. Supporting these circular models helps minimize waste and keeps valuable resources in use for longer. The goal is to move away from a linear fashion system towards one where materials are continuously cycled.

Educate Yourself and Others

Stay informed about sustainable fashion practices, new innovations, and ongoing issues in the industry. Share your knowledge with friends and family. The more informed consumers there are, the greater the collective pressure on brands to adopt truly sustainable practices.

Discover more essential tips for building a sustainable style.

Advocate for Change

Use your voice. Demand transparency from your favorite brands. Engage with brands on social media, sending thoughtful comments or questions about their sustainability claims. Support policies and initiatives that promote ethical labor and environmental protection within the fashion industry. Every purchase is a vote, and your advocacy can magnify that vote.

The Future of Fashion: Moving Beyond Greenwashing

The awareness around greenwashing is a positive step, signaling a growing consumer sophistication that demands more from brands. As we look towards the future, several trends and developments offer hope for a fashion industry that is genuinely sustainable and transparent.

Technological Innovations for Transparency

New technologies are emerging that can help combat greenwashing and foster greater transparency. Blockchain technology, for example, offers a secure and verifiable way to track a garment’s journey from raw material to finished product, providing immutable records of its origins and certifications. QR codes on clothing labels can link directly to detailed supply chain information, allowing consumers to verify claims instantly. Advanced data analytics can provide more accurate impact assessments, moving beyond vague statements to quantifiable metrics.

Stricter Regulations and Enforcement

Governments and regulatory bodies are beginning to take greenwashing more seriously. In 2026, we anticipate increased scrutiny and potentially stricter regulations around environmental marketing claims. The European Union, for instance, has been working on legislation to combat greenwashing, requiring companies to substantiate their green claims with scientific evidence. As these regulations become more widespread and enforceable, brands will face greater legal and reputational risks for making unsubstantiated sustainability claims. This will level the playing field for genuinely sustainable businesses.

The Rise of Circularity and Regenerative Practices

The fashion industry is slowly but surely moving beyond just “reducing harm” to actively regenerating ecosystems and creating circular systems. This includes:

• Designing for Durability and Repair: Emphasizing high-quality construction and offering repair services to extend garment lifespans.
• Material Innovation: Developing truly biodegradable materials, utilizing agricultural waste, and scaling up advanced textile-to-textile recycling technologies that can handle complex fiber blends.
• New Business Models: Shifting towards rental, resale, and subscription models that prioritize access over ownership and keep garments in use for longer.
• Regenerative Agriculture: Supporting farming practices that improve soil health, biodiversity, and sequester carbon, such as regenerative organic cotton farming.

These approaches represent a fundamental shift from the linear “take-make-dispose” model to one that emulates nature’s cycles, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.

Consumer Power and Collective Action

Ultimately, the most powerful driver of change lies with consumers. As more people learn what is greenwashing in fashion and adopt critical shopping habits, brands will be compelled to respond with genuine sustainable practices. Collective action, through consumer advocacy, supporting ethical brands, and demanding transparency, sends an undeniable signal to the market. The digital age facilitates this more than ever, allowing movements to gain traction rapidly and hold corporations accountable. By continually educating ourselves and making intentional choices, we contribute to a future where greenwashing is no longer effective, and true sustainability becomes the industry standard.

The path to a fully sustainable fashion industry is long and complex, but understanding and combating greenwashing is a crucial milestone on that journey. As consumers, our role is not passive; it is active, informed, and transformative. By embracing the strategies outlined in this guide, you empower yourself to make better choices, support genuine change, and contribute to a more responsible and stylish world.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: What is the main goal of greenwashing in fashion?

A1: The main goal of greenwashing in fashion is to mislead consumers into believing that a brand or product is more environmentally friendly or ethical than it actually is. This tactic aims to capitalize on growing consumer demand for sustainable products, boosting sales and brand image without investing heavily in genuine sustainable practices.

Q2: Why is greenwashing harmful?

A2: Greenwashing is harmful because it deceives consumers, leading them to unknowingly support unsustainable practices while believing they are making responsible choices. It also undermines the efforts of genuinely sustainable brands, dilutes the meaning of environmental claims, and delays systemic change within the fashion industry that is desperately needed to address climate change and social inequities.

Q3: What are some common red flags of greenwashing I should look out for?

A3: Common red flags include vague terms like “eco-friendly” or “green” without specific details or certifications, heavy use of nature imagery without substance, focusing on one minor “green” aspect while ignoring larger negative impacts, or a severe lack of transparency regarding supply chains, factory locations, or material origins. Also, be wary of fast fashion brands promoting small “conscious collections” that don’t reflect their overall unsustainable business model.

Q4: How can I tell if a sustainability certification is legitimate?

A4: To determine if a certification is legitimate, look for recognized third-party organizations with clear, publicly available standards and auditing processes. Reputable certifications like GOTS, Fair Trade, OEKO-TEX Standard 100, Bluesign, and Global Recycled Standard (GRS) are widely accepted and indicate independent verification. Be skeptical of self-created “certifications” or claims that are difficult to verify.

Q5: Besides spotting greenwashing, what else can I do to support sustainable fashion?

A5: Beyond identifying greenwashing, you can support sustainable fashion by prioritizing durability and quality over quantity, buying secondhand and vintage items, choosing materials wisely (e.g., organic cotton, linen, Tencel), supporting brands that are transparent about their supply chain, repairing and caring for your clothes, participating in circular economy initiatives (rental, resale), educating yourself, and advocating for change.

What Is Greenwashing in Fashion? How to Spot It While Shopping

By fashiongoggled Editorial Team — Senior editors with 10+ years of subject-matter experience.
Published 2026-05-26 · Last Updated 2026-05-26

Affiliate disclosure: This article may contain affiliate links. Recommendations are independent and editorially driven.

In an era where conscious consumerism is rapidly gaining momentum, the fashion industry finds itself at a pivotal crossroads. Consumers, more than ever, are demanding transparency, ethical production, and environmental responsibility from the brands they choose to support. This desire for more sustainable style choices is commendable and necessary, pushing the industry towards much-needed reforms. However, this shift has also unfortunately paved the way for a pervasive and insidious practice known as greenwashing.

Greenwashing in fashion is not merely a buzzword; it’s a deceptive marketing tactic employed by companies to portray an environmentally friendly, ethical, or sustainable image without genuinely implementing substantial, impactful practices. It’s a smokescreen designed to capitalize on growing consumer awareness and desire for sustainability, often without doing the actual work required to earn that reputation. For the discerning shopper, understanding what greenwashing is and, more importantly, how to spot it, is crucial for making truly responsible purchasing decisions.

This comprehensive guide from fashiongoggled will delve deep into the nuances of greenwashing in the fashion industry. We’ll explore its origins, the various forms it takes, the psychological tactics brands employ, and provide you with actionable strategies to become a more informed and empowered consumer. Our goal is to equip you with the knowledge to cut through the marketing noise, identify genuinely sustainable brands, and contribute to a more ethical and environmentally sound future for fashion.

The Genesis of Greenwashing: A Brief History and Its Evolution

While the term “greenwashing” might feel relatively modern, the concept of misrepresenting environmental efforts has roots stretching back decades. The term itself is often attributed to environmentalist Jay Westerveld, who, in a 1986 essay, critiqued the hotel industry’s practice of placing “reuse your towels” notices in rooms, ostensibly for environmental reasons, but primarily to cut laundry costs. This early example highlighted how superficial “green” initiatives could mask a lack of deeper commitment.

Early Environmental Concerns and Corporate Responses

The 1960s and 1970s saw a rise in public environmental awareness, fueled by events like the first Earth Day in 1970 and influential publications such as Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring.” As regulatory bodies began to form and environmental legislation gained traction, corporations found themselves under increasing scrutiny. Initial responses often involved adopting minimal changes or, more cynically, engaging in public relations campaigns to deflect criticism without undertaking significant operational overhauls. This early form of greenwashing largely focused on downplaying negative impacts or highlighting minor positive actions.

The Rise of Consumer Awareness and “Eco-Friendly” Labels

By the turn of the millennium and certainly in the 2010s, consumer demand for “eco-friendly” and “sustainable” products truly began to surge. This was driven by a confluence of factors: increased scientific consensus on climate change, wider media coverage of environmental disasters, and the rise of digital platforms that allowed for rapid dissemination of information (and misinformation). The fashion industry, historically one of the most polluting sectors globally, found itself particularly vulnerable to these new pressures.

Brands quickly recognized the market potential in appealing to environmentally conscious consumers. Terms like “natural,” “organic,” “recycled,” and “sustainable” began to proliferate on labels and marketing materials. However, without clear, universally accepted definitions or robust third-party verification, these terms became fertile ground for ambiguity and exploitation. The rapid growth of “fast fashion” during this period, ironically, ran counter to true sustainability, yet many of these same brands would begin to incorporate “eco-collections” or “conscious” lines, often with little genuine impact.

The Digital Age and Amplified Greenwashing

The advent of social media and influencer marketing has further complicated the greenwashing landscape. Brands can now disseminate their “green” messages directly to vast audiences, often leveraging appealing visuals and emotional narratives without strong factual backing. The ease of creating online campaigns that emphasize a brand’s purported sustainability, coupled with the difficulty for consumers to verify these claims independently, has made greenwashing more sophisticated and pervasive than ever before. In 2026, with sophisticated data analytics and targeted advertising, brands can tailor their greenwashing messages with precision, making it even harder for consumers to discern truth from fiction.

Defining Greenwashing in Fashion Context

At its core, greenwashing in fashion is the act of misleading consumers regarding the environmental practices of a company or the environmental benefits of a product or service. It’s about perception management rather than genuine environmental stewardship. For fashion, this often touches upon a wide array of problematic areas, from material sourcing and manufacturing processes to labor practices and end-of-life considerations for garments.

[INLINE IMAGE 1: place after second H2 | alt=”What Is Greenwashing in Fashion? How to Spot It While Shopping concept illustration”]

Key Characteristics of Greenwashing

• Vagueness: Using broad, undefined terms like “eco-friendly,” “natural,” “sustainable,” or “green” without providing specific details or certifications to back them up. What does “eco-friendly” truly mean in the context of a polyester garment?
• Irrelevance: Highlighting a marginally positive attribute while ignoring more significant negative impacts. A brand might proudly state their packaging is 100% recycled, yet their core production process is highly polluting and exploitative.
• Lesser of Two Evils: Claiming to be “green” within an inherently unsustainable product category. For example, a “sustainable” synthetic fabric that still contributes to microplastic pollution may be presented as a responsible choice without acknowledging its fundamental drawbacks.
• Hidden Trade-offs: Emphasizing one “green” attribute while neglecting or obscuring other, more damaging environmental impacts. A garment made from organic cotton might still have a massive water footprint or be dyed with toxic chemicals.
• No Proof: Making environmental claims without providing accessible evidence or third-party certifications to substantiate them. “Our factory uses less water” is a claim that requires data, not just assertion.
• Fibbing/Outright Lying: Making false claims or fabricating certifications. While rare due to potential legal repercussions, some brands may still engage in this, especially in less regulated markets.
• Worshipping False Labels: Using fake independent labels or seals of approval to give an impression of third-party endorsement that doesn’t exist or is not credible.

Why Brands Engage in Greenwashing

The primary motivation for greenwashing is, like most corporate strategies, profit. Brands observe the rising consumer demand for sustainability and seek to capture market share without incurring the often significant costs associated with genuinely transforming their supply chains and operational practices. The perceived benefits include:

• Enhanced Brand Image: Positioning the brand as responsible, ethical, and forward-thinking.
• Increased Sales: Attracting conscious consumers willing to pay a premium for perceived sustainable products.
• Competitive Advantage: Differentiating the brand from competitors who may not be making “green” claims.
• Risk Mitigation: Preempting potential criticism or regulatory action by appearing proactive on environmental issues.
• Investor Appeal: Attracting impact investors who prioritize ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) factors.

Understanding these motivations helps consumers realize that greenwashing is often a calculated business strategy, not just an accidental miscommunication. This knowledge is your first line of defense in identifying deceptive claims.

Common Greenwashing Tactics in Fashion Marketing

Greenwashing manifests in various forms within the fashion industry, often cleverly disguised within marketing campaigns, product descriptions, and corporate communications. Recognizing these common tactics is a critical step towards becoming an informed consumer.

Vague and Unsubstantiated Claims

• “Eco-Friendly” / “Sustainable”: These terms are perhaps the most overused and under-defined. Without context, they mean very little. What specific environmental impact is being reduced? How is it measured? A truly sustainable claim will be specific, e.g., “Made with 50% recycled polyester certified by GRS.”
• “Natural” / “Organic”: While these terms can be positive, they’re not always a guarantee of overall sustainability. “Natural” dyes can still be toxic, and “organic” cotton, while better for soil and farmers, still requires significant water. Always look for specific certifications (e.g., GOTS for organic textiles).
• “Conscious Collection”: Many fast fashion brands introduce limited “conscious” or “eco” collections. These often represent a tiny fraction of their overall production, while their core business remains highly unsustainable. It’s a distraction from broader systemic issues.

Misleading Language and Imagery

• Green Hues and Nature Imagery: Brands often use colors like green and earthy tones, alongside images of lush landscapes, pristine rivers, or smiling artisans, regardless of whether their production practices actually reflect such idyllic scenes. This creates a subconscious association with nature and purity.
• “Feel-Good” Narratives: Marketing often focuses on emotional appeals – “Join us in saving the planet!” or “Wear your values!” – without providing concrete details about how their products contribute to these lofty goals.
• Focus on a Single, Minor “Green” Element: A brand might heavily promote that their hang tags are recycled, while their garments are made from virgin synthetics, dyed with harsh chemicals, and produced in exploitative factories. This highlights an irrelevant positive while ignoring significant harms.

Lack of Transparency and Verification

• Absence of Supply Chain Information: A genuinely sustainable brand will typically be transparent about its supply chain, from fiber sourcing to manufacturing facilities. Greenwashers often provide vague statements like “ethically made” or “sourced responsibly” without disclosing the names or locations of their factories, details about labor conditions, or environmental certifications specific to those facilities.
• Self-Declared Claims Without Third-Party Certification: Many brands make claims like “our own standard for sustainability” or “our internal audit confirms…” These are often meaningless without independent verification. Look for reputable third-party certifications like GOTS, Fair Trade, OEKO-TEX, Bluesign, or the Global Recycled Standard (GRS).
• Inaccessible Information: Claims might be buried deep within a corporate social responsibility report that is difficult to find, overly technical, or lacks clear, actionable data. True transparency means easy access to key information.

Distraction and “Whataboutism”

• Blaming the Consumer: Some brands might push the responsibility entirely onto the consumer, e.g., “Extend the life of your garments by washing less.” While consumer behavior is important, it deflects from the brand’s own responsibility in producing durable, high-quality, and genuinely circular products.
• Focusing on End-of-Life Without Addressing Production: Emphasizing recycling programs or donation initiatives without addressing the massive environmental impact of their initial production processes. While these programs are helpful, they don’t absolve a brand of its primary environmental footprint.

By understanding these common tactics, consumers can begin to critically analyze the messages presented to them and look beyond the surface-level “green” facade.

The Impact of Greenwashing on Consumers and the Planet

Greenwashing isn’t just a harmless marketing gimmick; it carries significant negative consequences for both individual consumers and the broader movement towards genuine sustainability in fashion.

Consumer Deception and Erosion of Trust

• Misinformation and Confusion: Greenwashing saturates the market with vague and often contradictory claims, making it incredibly difficult for consumers to differentiate between genuinely sustainable options and misleading ones. This leads to decision fatigue and cynicism.
• Wasted Efforts: When consumers unknowingly purchase greenwashed products, their intention to support ethical and environmental practices is undermined. They spend their money on items that don’t align with their values, and their purchasing power doesn’t effectively contribute to positive change.
• Erosion of Trust: Repeated exposure to deceptive “green” claims leads to a lack of trust in all sustainability messaging, even from genuinely responsible brands. This makes it harder for true leaders in sustainable fashion to gain traction and communicate their authentic efforts.
• “Green Blame”: Some consumers, after realizing they’ve been misled, become disillusioned and may even abandon their efforts to shop sustainably, feeling that it’s too difficult or impossible to make a real difference.

Hindering Genuine Sustainable Progress

• Undermining Responsible Brands: Companies that invest heavily in ethical supply chains, sustainable materials, and fair labor practices often face higher production costs. Greenwashers, by cutting corners, can offer seemingly “sustainable” products at lower prices, unfairly competing with and penalizing truly responsible brands.
• Dilution of Standards: When vague or unverified terms become industry norms, the power and meaning of genuine certifications and rigorous standards are diluted. This makes it harder to establish and enforce clear benchmarks for sustainability.
• Delaying Systemic Change: Greenwashing allows brands to appear responsible without making fundamental changes to their unsustainable business models (e.g., fast fashion’s emphasis on rapid consumption). This delays the necessary systemic transformations required for a truly circular and ethical fashion industry.
• Environmental Damage Continues: The most critical impact is that while brands portray themselves as green, their actual operations continue to contribute to pollution, resource depletion, waste generation, and poor labor conditions. The planet pays the price, and exploited workers suffer, all under the guise of sustainability.

Understanding these repercussions underscores why it’s so important for consumers to develop critical thinking skills when evaluating fashion brands and their sustainability claims. Your choices have power, and knowing how to wield that power effectively is paramount.

How to Spot Greenwashing: A Practical Guide for Shoppers

Becoming an expert at spotting greenwashing requires a discerning eye and a willingness to dig a little deeper than what’s presented on the surface. Here’s a practical guide to help you navigate the complex world of fashion marketing and make truly informed sustainable choices.

[INLINE IMAGE 2: place after fourth H2 | alt=”What Is Greenwashing in Fashion? How to Spot It While Shopping comparison illustration”]

Look for Concrete Evidence, Not Just Buzzwords

• Specificity is Key: Vague terms like “eco-friendly,” “sustainable,” “green,” or “responsible” are red flags if not accompanied by specific details. A legitimate claim will explain how a product is sustainable (e.g., “made with 100% GOTS-certified organic cotton,” “uses 50% less water in denim production,” “produced in a Fair Trade certified factory”).
• Certifications, Certifications, Certifications: Look for recognized third-party certifications. These labels indicate that an independent organization has verified a brand’s claims against a set of rigorous standards.
• Beyond the Product Label: Don’t just read the tag. Visit the brand’s website. A genuinely sustainable brand will have a dedicated section (often titled “Sustainability,” “Our Impact,” or “Ethics”) that provides detailed information, reports, and evidence. If this information is hard to find or conspicuously absent, be wary.

Scrutinize Reputable Third-Party Certifications

Not all certifications are created equal. Familiarize yourself with some of the most respected ones:

Certification	Focus	What It Means for You
GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard)	Organic fibers, ecological & social criteria throughout the supply chain.	Guarantees organic status from harvesting through environmentally and socially responsible manufacturing.
Fair Trade Certified™	Fair wages, safe working conditions, community empowerment.	Ensures workers received fair payment & helps fund community development projects.
OEKO-TEX Standard 100	Absence of harmful substances.	Assures textiles are tested for harmful substances and are safe for human ecological terms.
Bluesign®	Resource productivity, consumer safety, water/air emissions, occupational health.	A holistic approach ensuring sustainable production processes from start to finish.
GRS (Global Recycled Standard)	Recycled content, social & environmental practices, chemical restrictions.	Verifies recycled content in products and responsible production.
B Corp Certification	Overall social and environmental performance, transparency, accountability.	Indicates a company meets high standards of verified performance, accountability, and transparency on factors from employee benefits and charitable giving to supply chain practices and input materials.
Leather Working Group (LWG)	Environmental performance of leather manufacturers.	Assesses tanneries based on their environmental compliance and capabilities.

Question the “Conscious Collection” Phenomena

If a large fast-fashion brand suddenly launches a small “conscious” line, consider the context. Does this collection truly represent a shift in their overall business model, or is it a small, token effort designed to appeal to sustainability trends while the vast majority of their production remains highly unsustainable? Look at the bigger picture of the brand’s offerings. Is the “sustainable” collection priced significantly higher? Is it primarily made from conventional materials with a tiny percentage of recycled content?

Investigate Supply Chain Transparency

• Disclosed Suppliers: Reputable sustainable brands often list their factories, suppliers, and sometimes even the names of the craftspeople involved. This builds trust and accountability.
• Audits and Worker Welfare: Do they mention independent audits of their factories? Do they discuss concrete initiatives for worker safety, fair wages, and empowerment? Claims of “ethical production” without any supporting details are thin.
• Material Origin: A brand claiming to use recycled materials should be able to state the source of those materials (e.g., post-consumer plastic bottles collected in X region).

Beware of Greenwashing by Omission

This is when a brand highlights one positive aspect while carefully omitting crucial negative information. For example, a brand might use “organic cotton” but fail to mention the toxic dyes used or the exploitative labor practices in their garment factories. A holistic view of sustainability encompasses environmental, social, and ethical dimensions. A truly sustainable brand addresses all these areas.

Consider Longevity and Circularity

True sustainability isn’t just about how an item is made but also how long it lasts and what happens to it at the end of its life. Does the brand promote durability, repair services, or take-back programs for recycling or upcycling? Fast fashion, by its very nature of encouraging frequent purchases of trend-driven, disposable items, is inherently unsustainable, regardless of any “eco” claims.

Utilize External Resources

Several organizations and apps are dedicated to helping consumers navigate sustainable fashion:

• Good On You: This app and website rates thousands of fashion brands on their impact on people, the planet, and animals. It’s an excellent tool for quick checks on brand sustainability claims.
• Fashion Revolution: An organization that campaigns for greater transparency in the fashion supply chain. Their annual Fashion Transparency Index is a valuable resource.
• Ethical Consumer: Provides detailed ethical ratings for products and companies.

By integrating these practices into your shopping habits, you can become a powerful force in pushing the fashion industry towards genuine sustainability and holding brands accountable for their claims.

Beyond Spotting: Supporting Genuine Sustainable Fashion

Identifying greenwashing is a vital first step, but the journey towards a more sustainable wardrobe doesn’t end there. Actively supporting brands that are genuinely committed to ethical and environmentally responsible practices is crucial for driving real change in the fashion industry.

Prioritize Durability and Quality

One of the most impactful sustainable choices you can make is to buy fewer, better-quality items that are designed to last. Fast fashion’s business model relies on planned obsolescence and encourages constant consumption. By investing in durable, timeless pieces, you reduce your overall consumption and waste. Consider the material quality, construction, and care instructions to gauge a garment’s potential lifespan.

For more on building a high-quality, lasting wardrobe, explore our guide to capsule wardrobe essentials.

Embrace Secondhand and Vintage

The most sustainable garment is often the one that already exists. Shopping secondhand, whether at thrift stores, consignment shops, or online marketplaces, drastically reduces the demand for new production and keeps clothes out of landfills. Vintage pieces are not only sustainable but also offer unique style and a rich history. This approach directly counters the linear “take-make-dispose” model of conventional fashion.

Choose Materials Wisely (and Critically)

Understanding the impact of different materials is key:

• Preferred Fibers: Look for materials like GOTS-certified organic cotton, linen (flax), hemp, Tencel™ Lyocell, EcoVero™ Viscose, recycled cotton, recycled polyester (GRS-certified), and innovative bio-based materials like Piñatex (pineapple leather) or Mycelium (mushroom leather).
• Understand the Nuances: Even “natural” fibers have varied impacts. Organic cotton is better than conventional cotton, but linen and hemp generally require less water and pesticides. Recycled synthetics are better than virgin synthetics but still contribute to microplastic shedding. Always consider the full lifecycle.
• Avoid Problematic Materials: Try to minimize purchases of virgin petroleum-based synthetics (polyester, nylon, acrylic), conventional cotton, and conventional rayon/viscose unless certified from sustainably managed forests (e.g., FSC-certified).

Support Transparent Brands

Actively seek out brands that are open about their entire supply chain, from fiber growth to garment assembly. A genuinely sustainable brand will provide:

• Factory Locations and Names: Not just a generic “ethically produced.”
• Social Audits and Labor Practices: Details on fair wages, safe working conditions, and worker empowerment initiatives.
• Environmental Performance Data: Information on water usage, energy consumption, waste reduction, and chemical management.
• Certifications: Clearly displayed and easily verifiable third-party certifications.

This transparency allows you to make informed decisions and holds brands accountable for their promises.

Value Repair and Care

Extend the life of your clothes by learning basic mending skills or utilizing professional repair services. Following care instructions diligently (washing in cold water, air-drying, avoiding excessive washing) also significantly reduces the environmental impact of your wardrobe and ensures your garments last longer. A garment cared for is a sustainable garment.

Participate in the Circular Economy

Beyond buying secondhand, look for brands that offer take-back programs, rental services, or robust recycling initiatives. Supporting these circular models helps minimize waste and keeps valuable resources in use for longer. The goal is to move away from a linear fashion system towards one where materials are continuously cycled.

Educate Yourself and Others

Stay informed about sustainable fashion practices, new innovations, and ongoing issues in the industry. Share your knowledge with friends and family. The more informed consumers there are, the greater the collective pressure on brands to adopt truly sustainable practices.

Discover more essential tips for building a sustainable style.

Advocate for Change

Use your voice. Demand transparency from your favorite brands. Engage with brands on social media, sending thoughtful comments or questions about their sustainability claims. Support policies and initiatives that promote ethical labor and environmental protection within the fashion industry. Every purchase is a vote, and your advocacy can magnify that vote.

The Future of Fashion: Moving Beyond Greenwashing

The awareness around greenwashing is a positive step, signaling a growing consumer sophistication that demands more from brands. As we look towards the future, several trends and developments offer hope for a fashion industry that is genuinely sustainable and transparent.

Technological Innovations for Transparency

New technologies are emerging that can help combat greenwashing and foster greater transparency. Blockchain technology, for example, offers a secure and verifiable way to track a garment’s journey from raw material to finished product, providing immutable records of its origins and certifications. QR codes on clothing labels can link directly to detailed supply chain information, allowing consumers to verify claims instantly. Advanced data analytics can provide more accurate impact assessments, moving beyond vague statements to quantifiable metrics.

Stricter Regulations and Enforcement

Governments and regulatory bodies are beginning to take greenwashing more seriously. In 2026, we anticipate increased scrutiny and potentially stricter regulations around environmental marketing claims. The European Union, for instance, has been working on legislation to combat greenwashing, requiring companies to substantiate their green claims with scientific evidence. As these regulations become more widespread and enforceable, brands will face greater legal and reputational risks for making unsubstantiated sustainability claims. This will level the playing field for genuinely sustainable businesses.

The Rise of Circularity and Regenerative Practices

The fashion industry is slowly but surely moving beyond just “reducing harm” to actively regenerating ecosystems and creating circular systems. This includes:

• Designing for Durability and Repair: Emphasizing high-quality construction and offering repair services to extend garment lifespans.
• Material Innovation: Developing truly biodegradable materials, utilizing agricultural waste, and scaling up advanced textile-to-textile recycling technologies that can handle complex fiber blends.
• New Business Models: Shifting towards rental, resale, and subscription models that prioritize access over ownership and keep garments in use for longer.
• Regenerative Agriculture: Supporting farming practices that improve soil health, biodiversity, and sequester carbon, such as regenerative organic cotton farming.

These approaches represent a fundamental shift from the linear “take-make-dispose” model to one that emulates nature’s cycles, minimizing waste and maximizing resource utilization.

Consumer Power and Collective Action

Ultimately, the most powerful driver of change lies with consumers. As more people learn what is greenwashing in fashion and adopt critical shopping habits, brands will be compelled to respond with genuine sustainable practices. Collective action, through consumer advocacy, supporting ethical brands, and demanding transparency, sends an undeniable signal to the market. The digital age facilitates this more than ever, allowing movements to gain traction rapidly and hold corporations accountable. By continually educating ourselves and making intentional choices, we contribute to a future where greenwashing is no longer effective, and true sustainability becomes the industry standard.

The path to a fully sustainable fashion industry is long and complex, but understanding and combating greenwashing is a crucial milestone on that journey. As consumers, our role is not passive; it is active, informed, and transformative. By embracing the strategies outlined in this guide, you empower yourself to make better choices, support genuine change, and contribute to a more responsible and stylish world.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: What is the main goal of greenwashing in fashion?

A1: The main goal of greenwashing in fashion is to mislead consumers into believing that a brand or product is more environmentally friendly or ethical than it actually is. This tactic aims to capitalize on growing consumer demand for sustainable products, boosting sales and brand image without investing heavily in genuine sustainable practices.

Q2: Why is greenwashing harmful?

A2: Greenwashing is harmful because it deceives consumers, leading them to unknowingly support unsustainable practices while believing they are making responsible choices. It also undermines the efforts of genuinely sustainable brands, dilutes the meaning of environmental claims, and delays systemic change within the fashion industry that is desperately needed to address climate change and social inequities.

Q3: What are some common red flags of greenwashing I should look out for?

A3: Common red flags include vague terms like “eco-friendly” or “green” without specific details or certifications, heavy use of nature imagery without substance, focusing on one minor “green” aspect while ignoring larger negative impacts, or a severe lack of transparency regarding supply chains, factory locations, or material origins. Also, be wary of fast fashion brands promoting small “conscious collections” that don’t reflect their overall unsustainable business model.

Q4: How can I tell if a sustainability certification is legitimate?

A4: To determine if a certification is legitimate, look for recognized third-party organizations with clear, publicly available standards and auditing processes. Reputable certifications like GOTS, Fair Trade, OEKO-TEX Standard 100, Bluesign, and Global Recycled Standard (GRS) are widely accepted and indicate independent verification. Be skeptical of self-created “certifications” or claims that are difficult to verify.

Q5: Besides spotting greenwashing, what else can I do to support sustainable fashion?

A5: Beyond identifying greenwashing, you can support sustainable fashion by prioritizing durability and quality over quantity, buying secondhand and vintage items, choosing materials wisely (e.g., organic cotton, linen, Tencel), supporting brands that are transparent about their supply chain, repairing and caring for your clothes, participating in circular economy initiatives (rental, resale), educating yourself, and advocating for change.